Job Seekers

Building Your Personal Brand

Mostly a matter of being findable, consistent and specific. Very little of it requires becoming a person who posts.

The short answer

  • The useful version is narrow: be findable, say the same thing everywhere, and be specific about what you do. That is most of the value.
  • Specific beats impressive. Being known for one clear thing is worth more than being vaguely accomplished at several.
  • Evidence outperforms opinion. Work you can point at persuades where posts about the field do not.
  • Someone will search for your name before an interview. Being aware of what they find is the whole of the defensive half.

The useful version

Personal brand has acquired an unfortunate meaning involving constant posting and a considered aesthetic. Most professionals need none of that.

What they need is three things. That someone looking for a person who does what you do can find you. That the version of you they find is the same in each place. And that the description is specific enough to be memorable.

All three are achievable in an afternoon, and they capture most of the benefit. Everything past that has real returns in some fields and close to none in others.

Be specific rather than impressive

"Experienced professional with a track record of delivering results" describes nobody. "I rebuild reporting systems for companies whose data has outgrown their spreadsheets" describes one person and is remembered.

The instinct to stay broad comes from fear of ruling opportunities out. In practice broad descriptions do not attract more opportunities, they attract none, because there is nothing in them for anyone to recall when a relevant thing comes up.

Pick the thing you want more of, describe that, and let the rest live in your history where it is still visible to anyone reading properly.

Evidence over opinion

Commentary about your field is cheap and everyone has some. Work is scarce and persuasive.

What counts as evidence varies: a portfolio, code, published work, a case study of something you fixed, a talk, a template other people use. The common feature is that someone can look at it and reach their own conclusion rather than taking your word.

One good piece of evidence outlasts a year of posting, and it does not require you to become a person who posts.

Frequently Asked Questions

Not in the sense of posting regularly or cultivating an audience. The useful version is narrow: be findable, present the same version of yourself in each place, and describe what you do specifically enough to be memorable. That takes an afternoon and captures most of the benefit.
More specific than feels comfortable. Broad descriptions do not attract more opportunities, they attract none, because there is nothing in them for anyone to remember when something relevant comes up. Describe the work you want more of, and let the rest stay visible in your history.
It has real returns in some fields and close to none in others, and it is the most expensive option in time. Evidence outperforms opinion: a portfolio, published work, a case study or something other people use persuades in a way commentary does not, and one good piece of it outlasts a year of posting.
Search it yourself from a browser that is not logged in. You are checking two things: whether anything actively unhelpful appears, and whether the professional version of you appears at all, which for a common name is often not the case. That is the argument for one complete, specific profile that can be the thing that surfaces.

Make your profile the thing that surfaces

A complete profile is what matching reads and what an employer sees when they find you.